Support, not citation presence
A bibliography can be technically correct while the source does not support the sentence attached to it. Epistamate treats the claim–evidence relationship as an inspectable object.
Research quality depends on what the sources actually establish, whether corroboration is genuinely independent, which qualifications survive synthesis, and whether a later reviewer can reconstruct how the conclusion was formed.
The research product is early access. The long-lived cross-topic Knowledge layer remains under canonical rebuild rather than being claimed here as finished.
A bibliography can be technically correct while the source does not support the sentence attached to it. Epistamate treats the claim–evidence relationship as an inspectable object.
Repeated reporting of one underlying study or claim is amplification. Source/work/family identity is part of the evidence posture.
Gaps and contradictions should survive into the output and the next research plan instead of disappearing behind fluent synthesis.
A senior reviewer should be able to see what AI prioritised, what the analyst inspected and which decisions were explicitly made.
We are looking for workflows where source support, provenance, researcher judgement and repeatability matter more than faster prose.
Start a conversation →