Two tools, one page. Score a claim against evidence-quality criteria, or surface candidate papers from three academic databases. Use one or both.
Suggested questions →
Carbon border adjustment mechanisms
AI regulation effectiveness EU vs US
Evidence base for four-day work week policies
Generative AI impact on knowledge worker productivity
General research
Policy / Think tank
Consulting
Regulatory / Compliance
Enter a claim or research question to surface related papers from CrossRef, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex. Results are unverified leads, not admitted evidence.
No candidate papers found for this query. Try rephrasing with more specific terminology.
About this demo: This demonstration simulates the Epistamate DCBR pipeline, showing how claims are extracted, scored against evidence-quality criteria, challenged adversarially, and compiled into a structured brief with gap tracking. In the full desktop application, this runs locally with multi-provider parallel retrieval, a persistent knowledge graph, and an immutable Decision Log. Evidence scores reflect the formula structure; in production, source tier assignments draw on real document ingestion and retrieval.