Historical prototype demo · DCBR Pipeline + Cite Explorer

See how Epistamate works.

This interactive page preserves an earlier DCBR research prototype. It is useful for exploring claim-level evidence interaction and candidate-source discovery, but its formula scoring and phase mechanics are not the current canonical Epistamate evidence-authority model.

Enter a research question or claim as text. This demo does not support document upload or file attachment.

Prototype note: current Epistamate separates model reasoning from evidence authority, does not treat model/provider agreement as independent corroboration, and does not let human approval itself strengthen the underlying evidence.

Suggested questions →
Carbon border adjustment mechanisms
AI regulation effectiveness EU vs US
Evidence base for four-day work week policies
Generative AI impact on knowledge worker productivity
General research
Policy / Think tank
Consulting
Regulatory / Compliance
About this demo: This demonstration simulates the Epistamate DCBR pipeline, showing how claims are extracted, scored against evidence-quality criteria, challenged adversarially, and compiled into a structured brief with gap tracking. Input is a typed research question or claim -- the demo does not process uploaded documents or files. In the full desktop application, this runs locally with multi-provider parallel retrieval, a persistent knowledge graph, and an immutable Decision Log. Evidence scores reflect the formula structure; in production, source tier assignments draw on real retrieval and ingestion from declared source packs.